Home | Real Estate Search | Classifieds | Place an Ad | Public Notices | Galleries | Obituaries | Subscriber Services | Kingman Digital | Contact Us
Kingman Daily Miner | Kingman, Arizona

home : opinion : opinion April 28, 2016

4/22/2014 6:00:00 AM
Column: Net Neutrality loses out in Comcast deal

Ryan Abella
Miner Staff Reporter

Comcast has recently made a series of moves that have brought into question Net Neutrality rules, the role of the FCC and the business model of the Internet. Their $45 billion bid for Time Warner Cable is the latest move by the world's largest mass media and communication company, and if it goes through it would give Comcast access to a third of the nation's cable customers and nearly 40 percent of the nation's broadband customers.

But companies buy companies all the time. That's nothing new. It is the response in Washington that should concern every Internet user in America.

An April 9 Senate Judiciary Hearing investigated the merger of Comcast and Time Warner Cable. The 18-member committee consists of 10 Democrats and eight Republicans and should be impartial to the parties involved.

That was all for show, as every senator on that committee has taken money from Comcast's political action committee.

The highlight of the morning came from Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., when he brought up Net Neutrality rules. When Comcast acquired NBCUniversal in 2011, it voluntarily adopted Net Neutrality rules through 2018. Leahy expressed in a statement that he "hoped that Comcast would accept an extension of these rules beyond 2018."

Hope implies that Leahy and his colleagues have little control over Net Neutrality and that they will rely on the good faith of Comcast not to do wrong by the consumer. That hope was misplaced months ago when Comcast decided to throttle Netflix and relaunch the Net Neutrality debate.

Net Neutrality is based on the idea that all packets transferred through the Internet should be treated with the same priority. That means that the Kingman Daily Miner's website will be able to operate at the same speeds and priority as bigger websites like Amazon or Google. You can think of it like our open interstate system. All the cars, or packets, can freely travel between destinations at the same speeds without discrimination.

ISPs can neither be paid nor offer preferential service to specific companies to throttle their traffic. Think of throttled traffic like toll roads, where you can pay money to get better traffic speed.

The FCC also has their "Open Internet Rules" which state three things; ISPs must be transparent, they must never block lawful content, and they must never unreasonably discriminate among network traffic.

A couple of months ago, Comcast decided that Netflix was using too much bandwidth on their networks as a peer provider and throttled their data significantly. This created a poor experience for Netflix's customers, as their video was choppy and at times unwatchable. Comcast wanted money from Netflix to allow them full access to their network. While Netflix strongly objected and cried out Net Neutrality foul play, they paid Comcast because they didn't want to risk losing Comcast's significant customer base.

Comcast challenged Net Neutrality and won.

If Net Neutrality was law, this issue would have been solved in court. However, in January, a federal appeals court stated that the FCC does not have the authority to create Open Internet Rules. The rules are guidelines, not laws. The FCC is still working on a new set of rules and legislation that enforces Net Neutrality.

Countries are already lapping the United States in passing their own Net Neutrality laws. Brazil passed their "Internet Constitution" that protects freedom of expression on the Internet and sets limits on what metadata on Internet users can be gathered. The European Union adopted Net Neutrality rules this year that made throttling data unlawful.

While other countries are securing that critical pillar of Internet freedom, we have Comcast who's whittling at the base of it. They would love nothing more than to keep Net Neutrality on the sidelines.

They can do it, too. Comcast posted $13.6 billion in income last year. Their PAC already spent $2.1 million in 2014 and their donations cross party lines. They are big enough to influence any Net Neutrality legislation, and with the acquisition of Time Warner Cable there won't be very many big names to challenge them.

Comcast is threatening more than just the quality of your Netflix stream. Net Neutrality prevents lawful content from being blocked. That is the foundation of the Internet: freedom of information. Information is a right, not a commodity. Without Net Neutrality, all that information is open to exploitation, profit and manipulation.

Are we honestly expected to trust a company like Comcast with the responsibility of maintaining a free and open Internet?

    Most Viewed     Recently Commented
•   Hard legal lessons faced by accused in home invasion case (2226 views)

•   20-year sentence possible for murder in Yucca (1548 views)

•   Alleged theft among counts returned by grand jury (874 views)

•   Important measures await votes on May 17 special ballot (788 views)

•   McCain fundraiser arrested following drug raid (689 views)

Reader Comments

Posted: Thursday, April 24, 2014
Article comment by: jim harper

What do you think Comcast will charge to carry some sort of rinky-dinky left-wing blog with 20K readers? I'm thinking quite a lot.

This was an inevitable move by our ruling class. The guiding principle of the federal courts is that the people who own the country should run it. Their traditional arsenal of hugely expensive political ads, ownership of the large newspapers and network media were eroding.

Add to that the consistent impulse towards rent-seeking by the plutocrats, (A pair of rabbit-ears and a $10 per month subscription to Netflix? Not hardly, bub.) and the little guy had no chance.

Posted: Tuesday, April 22, 2014
Article comment by: What Can WE Do?

Is this a 'write your Senator' issue?

Posted: Tuesday, April 22, 2014
Article comment by: Allan Gleason

Just another example of how the Supreme Court and our "representatives" are screwing us and allowing big business to rule our lives!

Posted: Tuesday, April 22, 2014
Article comment by: Rick O'Shea

Good article! Unfortunately most people will not pay attention until their freedom is gone.

Article Comment Submission Form
Comments are not posted immediately. Submissions must adhere to our Use of Service Terms of Use agreement. Rambling or nonsensical comments may not be posted. Comments are limited to Facebook character limits. In order for us to reasonably manage this feature we may limit excessive comment entries.
Submit an Article Comment
First Name:
Last Name:
Anti-SPAM Passcode Click here to see a new mix of characters.
This is an anti-SPAM device. It is not case sensitive.

Advanced Search

Find more about Weather in Kingman, AZ
Click for weather forecast

Find it Features Blogs Milestones Extras Submit Other Publications Local Listings
Real Estate Search | Classifieds | Place an Ad | Find Kingman Jobs | Kingman Chamber | e-News | Contact Us | RSS | Site Map
© Copyright 2016 Western News&Info, Inc.® The Kingman Daily Miner is the information source for Kingman and surrounding area communities in Northern Arizona. Original content may not be reprinted or distributed without the written permission of Western News&Info, Inc.® Kingman Daily Miner Online is a service of WNI. By using the Site, kdminer.com ®, you agree to abide and be bound by the Site's terms of use and Privacy Policy, which prohibit commercial use of any information on the Site. Click here to email your questions, comments or suggestions. Kingman Daily Miner Online is a proud publication of Western News&Info, Inc.® All Rights Reserved.

Software © 1998-2016 1up! Software, All Rights Reserved