Community View | Ethical hunters recognize killing contests for what they are
This is in response to your article in the April 9, 2019 Daily Miner edition, “The end is near for coyote hunting contest.”
All of us are tired of the paranoid, nonsensical argument of the “creeping incrementalism” that is a transparent synonym for the “slippery slope” argument. The Arizona residents who have recently learned about these disgusting killing contests aren’t trying to stop ethical hunters or steal your precious guns. Thanks to the hard work of a core group of Arizona residents (not outside organizations as you suggest), the greater Arizona populace have voiced their concern to their local governments to initiate change, which in turn reached the state level and the instruction of the Arizona Game and Fish Commission.
Arizona local and state governments – and especially the AZGF commission would never bow to the whims of a California-based conservation organization no matter how much sense they made or how much money was behind them, or even how much science supported them. Secondly, if anyone concerned about Project Coyotes goals would actually take the time to read through the articles on its website and/or watch their videos, they would see that this organization is certainly not trying to stop hunting or is even against hunting, rather they are mostly an educational/conservation based organization attempting to illuminate the need for predator management based in science.
This is not an “anti” conspiracy or a “left wing liberal” agenda as you suggest. This is a nonpartisan issue being addressed by Arizona residents who recognize the obvious; wildlife killing contests are NOT hunting. The indiscriminate killing of predators for cash, prizes and selfies – and resultant discarding of coyote, bobcat, and fox dead bodies on our public lands is beyond disrespectful and pathetically disgusting. Not only do killing contests violate the Public Trust Doctrine, they violate every single tenant of the North American Model.
You cite a few statistics in your article, then admit that you don’t understand the science. I and others do understand the science very well, and it is freely available and easy to obtain and read. If you really want to know the entire history, I suggest the book “Coyote America” by Dan Flores, which describes the entire issue in layman terms which everyone can appreciate. Or you could start at the beginning with Aldo Leopold, Adolph and Olaus Murie, and move on from there. Study compensatory breeding relating to stressed environment, canidae pack dysfunction caused by loss of alpha individuals, fission/fusion evolutionary triggers, and most of all - why don’t you take a hike into the wild without a weapon and look a coyote in the eye and decide for yourself what is morally correct.
In 1999 AZGFD tried to pass a rule banning killing contests that was eventually rejected by the Governors Regulatory Review Council for technical reasons. In other words, AZGFD knows killing contests are not a population management tool, and they actually cause more problems. That is why you and others who want to slaughter our predators for selfies should respect the management direction of the department you consistently claim you respect and support their ruling.
You are right, where are the antelope and deer organizations? Perhaps they are with the vast majority of ethical hunters who recognize killing contests for what they are; a perverted black-eye to the sport of hunting. Killing contests are part of the problem with the decline of the national public opinion of hunting and hunters.
Nobody is trying to end hunting in this country. Nobody is coming for your guns either, but if you want to slaughter our wildlife, we are coming.